The
9th WAC
The inagural dais |
I
am one among many who missed Lavanam Gora -the pioneer atheist, who passed away
a few months back. I had met him four years back during the 8th
edition of the WAC at Trichy, Tamil Nadu. He firmly believed in potential of
the youth and stood as a motivator.
The indomitable Dr Vijayam conducted the
proceedings with the usual flair. Another doyen of Indian rationalist thought –
Dr Veeramani inaugurated the WAC in his usual and exemplary spirit. He carries forward
the torch of self respect , equality, and humanism lit by another great
rationalist – Periyar. As I greeted Dr Veeramani, I was surprised to hear him
mention my name. "You still remember me, Sir" was my reaction.
"How can we forget you" was his response. Remembering small things is
a quality of great leaders.
Stalwarts likeProf Narendra Nayak and Babu
Goginini were at their usual best. Prof Narandra Nayak talked about threats to
his life as one newspaper reported him to be on the hitlist of those who have
already assassinated Narendra Dhabolka, Govind Pansare, and M M Kalburgi. In a lighter vein Prof Nayak said he was not happy about being at number
seven on that list. What will I have to do to get a higher ranking, he joked
amid clapping and laughter of the audience.
Need for scientific temperament and secularism
being the theme was amply discussed and deliberated upon both in speeches as
well as in plenary sessions. Babu Goginini gave a beautiful presentation on
secularism.
Secularism is clearly a skewed concept in India.
It stresses upon equality of all religions but doesn't ensure equality for all
individuals. We need a uniform civil code as the minimum basic to ensure
equality in law and society. In the plenary session on secularism when
I raised the uniform civil code I found support from Dr Rastad – the President
of the Norwegian Humanist Association, who cited many examples of what some of
the European countries have not only legislated but implemented as well.
Unfortunately, a mention of a uniform civil code evokes a negative response
from some atheists. They perhaps identify the ucc with hindutva. At the same
time they also want secularism properly defined. Ironical.
Comments
Post a Comment